<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Deal or No Deal: Surprise Texting Charges</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mouseprint.org/2007/06/18/deal-or-no-deal-surprise-texting-charges/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mouseprint.org/2007/06/18/deal-or-no-deal-surprise-texting-charges/</link>
	<description>Exposing the strings and catches buried in the fine print.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 19:52:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Edgar Jr</title>
		<link>http://www.mouseprint.org/2007/06/18/deal-or-no-deal-surprise-texting-charges/comment-page-1/#comment-239252</link>
		<dc:creator>Edgar Jr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Apr 2011 00:36:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mouseprint.org/?p=260#comment-239252</guid>
		<description>&quot;I have a question. I text with a pre-paid Tracfone. I always get a reply saying thanks for my entry, but I always wonder if it counts, because I’m not being charged the $1 entry fee. Does anyone know? Am I just wasting my texts? Thanks.

Edgar replies: Jen, if you normally get charged for incoming text messages, you are most likely charged for their thank you message. The easiest way to tell is to check your balance before sending the text message, and then again after you get the thank you.&quot;


Premium Text Messaging rates don&#039;t seem to apply to Tracfone (I have one as well).  Every text message is 0.3 units regardless of the type of text message - Twitter&#039;s &#039;40404&#039; is classified as a Premium Text Messaging service and I get deducted the same number of units as a regular text.  I suspect AT&amp;T (Tracfone&#039;s primary carrier) eats the entire cost of premium texts on Tracfone.  I suppose if people start abusing this functionality, Tracfone/AT&amp;T would make premium texting vanish real fast.  It does have the advantage of sending $10 to the Red Cross for relief efforts in Japan for about 35 cents (roughly the cost of a single text message on Tracfone).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I have a question. I text with a pre-paid Tracfone. I always get a reply saying thanks for my entry, but I always wonder if it counts, because I’m not being charged the $1 entry fee. Does anyone know? Am I just wasting my texts? Thanks.</p>
<p>Edgar replies: Jen, if you normally get charged for incoming text messages, you are most likely charged for their thank you message. The easiest way to tell is to check your balance before sending the text message, and then again after you get the thank you.&#8221;</p>
<p>Premium Text Messaging rates don&#8217;t seem to apply to Tracfone (I have one as well).  Every text message is 0.3 units regardless of the type of text message &#8211; Twitter&#8217;s &#8217;40404&#8242; is classified as a Premium Text Messaging service and I get deducted the same number of units as a regular text.  I suspect AT&amp;T (Tracfone&#8217;s primary carrier) eats the entire cost of premium texts on Tracfone.  I suppose if people start abusing this functionality, Tracfone/AT&amp;T would make premium texting vanish real fast.  It does have the advantage of sending $10 to the Red Cross for relief efforts in Japan for about 35 cents (roughly the cost of a single text message on Tracfone).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jen</title>
		<link>http://www.mouseprint.org/2007/06/18/deal-or-no-deal-surprise-texting-charges/comment-page-1/#comment-73869</link>
		<dc:creator>Jen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2008 00:13:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mouseprint.org/?p=260#comment-73869</guid>
		<description>I have a question. I text with a pre-paid Tracfone. I always get a reply saying thanks for my entry, but I always wonder if it counts, because I&#039;m not being charged the $1 entry fee. Does anyone know? Am I just wasting my texts? Thanks.

Edgar replies: Jen, if you normally get charged for incoming text messages, you are most likely charged for their thank you message.  The easiest way to tell is to check your balance before sending the text message, and then again after you get the thank you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a question. I text with a pre-paid Tracfone. I always get a reply saying thanks for my entry, but I always wonder if it counts, because I&#8217;m not being charged the $1 entry fee. Does anyone know? Am I just wasting my texts? Thanks.</p>
<p>Edgar replies: Jen, if you normally get charged for incoming text messages, you are most likely charged for their thank you message.  The easiest way to tell is to check your balance before sending the text message, and then again after you get the thank you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark J Smith</title>
		<link>http://www.mouseprint.org/2007/06/18/deal-or-no-deal-surprise-texting-charges/comment-page-1/#comment-59722</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark J Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2007 02:32:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mouseprint.org/?p=260#comment-59722</guid>
		<description>Plain and simple - never respond to these scams. Same as so many others. But unfortunately there are always the fools and their money so easily parted.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Plain and simple &#8211; never respond to these scams. Same as so many others. But unfortunately there are always the fools and their money so easily parted.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nico</title>
		<link>http://www.mouseprint.org/2007/06/18/deal-or-no-deal-surprise-texting-charges/comment-page-1/#comment-51639</link>
		<dc:creator>Nico</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2007 06:32:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mouseprint.org/?p=260#comment-51639</guid>
		<description>This is another one where it&#039;s a case of &quot;don&#039;t text to numbers you see on tv that contain fine print.&quot;  

Also, in Nico&#039;s view, offering to play the game for free only via the Internet is a viable alternate means.  

Want a 1-800 number to call?  Pfft.  1-800 numbers COST money, so that went the way of the &quot;Who Wants to be a Millionaire?&quot; contest.  Also note that these contests are a way to force viewers to watch the show in real time, not time-shifting TiVo.  This guarantees the advertisers more viewers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is another one where it&#8217;s a case of &#8220;don&#8217;t text to numbers you see on tv that contain fine print.&#8221;  </p>
<p>Also, in Nico&#8217;s view, offering to play the game for free only via the Internet is a viable alternate means.  </p>
<p>Want a 1-800 number to call?  Pfft.  1-800 numbers COST money, so that went the way of the &#8220;Who Wants to be a Millionaire?&#8221; contest.  Also note that these contests are a way to force viewers to watch the show in real time, not time-shifting TiVo.  This guarantees the advertisers more viewers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kelly</title>
		<link>http://www.mouseprint.org/2007/06/18/deal-or-no-deal-surprise-texting-charges/comment-page-1/#comment-34303</link>
		<dc:creator>Kelly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jun 2007 14:11:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mouseprint.org/?p=260#comment-34303</guid>
		<description>But what is the number of households that do not have cellphones?  I would guess that the number of households without internet and the number of households without internet is roughly similar.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But what is the number of households that do not have cellphones?  I would guess that the number of households without internet and the number of households without internet is roughly similar.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

