Are you paying for boots, or are you paying for waterproof feet?
$60 for boots seems reasonable if they last for several years AS BOOTS

But $60 for waterproof footwear that only lasts 6 months seems excessive. It the waterproofing only lasts that long (which is *not* what the tag says, but does imply that) then I hope they at least offer ways to re-water-proof the boots when that major feature wears off. (And no I don't think this should be the consumers responsibility to research how to do that and more than I would expect the consumer to have to research how to repair a car airbag that is only guaranteed for six months.)