An interesting observation about the Burger King nutrition numbers: Comparing their "value" fries to the "Satisfries," the serving size drops from 89 to 87 grams (2% drop) but the total carbohydrate drops from 34 to 28 calories (18% drop). That carb (plus the 2 gram fat drop) are probably responsible for the 21% drop in calories (from 240 to 190), but how did they reduce carbs by 6 grams when the serving size only dropped 2 grams? They didn't replace it with protein (no change) and the fat content dropped. It seems, apparently, that they replaced 4 grams of potato with water. I wouldn't consider this dishonest. Rather, it may be a good way to reduce calories if you're going to eat French fries. But do the fries still taste good enough to want to eat them?