I stand by my previous false advt statement. If you wantvto be truthful youbshould compare current model to competitors current model you are comparing. So that is misleading at best.

The other day i saw a drug advt. it stated how wonderful theur drug was as compared to ...a placebo or nothing at all.

So that means when you compare things in an advt as long as you compare to an inferior product you can say how wonderful your is.

Even tv stations are now in on the act. They get a certification that their weathermen are "mosy accurate" ok so what are the qualifications for this statement ! No one will say. So if channel a is right 25% of time b 27% and most accurate 30% then the statement is factually correct but still not right. 30% accurate means 70% inaccurate. So if i say my phone is greatest but compare to an old phone that is misleading and to me false advt.

Why not work to make your product as good as you claim so you can truthfully compare it to all models of all, phones and come out best !