Not sure why the class action lawyers would even show that last column, in which at first glance it appears (deceptively) that the number of servings is 93% of the claimed amount.

The label shows that one 6-oz serving uses 1 tablespoon of product. So 10 servings should use 10 tablespoons of product, yet 1/2 cup only contains 8 tablespoons. So in order to make the coffee the same strength with both "recipes," you would have to use 48 oz of water. Note that the amount of water for 10 servings is not even shown on the label, so it's not even a real recipe. If you make 10 servings using 1/2 cup of product using their suggested individual-cup strength, you end up with 4.8oz cups of coffee instead of 6 oz.

This problem is evident in item #2 (on page 2) of the first class action complaint, where the attorneys assume that the bulk recipe serving size is 6oz, rather than assuming that strength of the coffee should remain the same when scaled up.

Instead, they should have just stuck with the individual serving recipe. It makes their argument stronger.

Folgers is correct that people like their coffee with different strengths, but their label expressly states the strength, so they're wrong, wrong, wrong. Heck, I'm sure some people like really weak coffee, only one tablespoon per pint of water. That's 416 6-oz servings per container. What a steal!