I'm still trying to figure out how they ever thought they were going to get anywhere with the claim of no tuna in Subway tuna sandwiches. They had to know that was a false claim and that they really had no test results to "prove it". So what was the real goal here? It almost makes me wonder if Subway's competition or someone with something against them put them up to the lawsuit so as to tarnish their reputation and they knew that the "litigation privilege" would make it exempt from a libel lawsuit.