In reply to Randall Flagg.

I for one appreciated this article, largely on the basis that it hadn't really occurred to me that yes, this promotion is technically a sweepstakes that would require a "no purchase necessary" option to legally not be a lottery. Likely because a) it isn't really presented as such and b) unlike most of these sweepstakes the *only* prizes are the small food things, with no larger/non-food prizes that would be far more likely to entice someone to order something they otherwise wouldn't have just to have a chance of winning.