This is just desperation piled onto desperation piled onto desperation. How do these people find lawyers to dedicated all this time to. I understand the judge didn't have sufficient reason to dismiss the case, but even he must see at this point that this is just vindictive. I wonder if this is somehow being supported by one of Subway's competitors.

Either way, Subway's tuna is tuna. My wife used to work there and she can tell you it's tuna. The label says tuna, it smells like tuna, it looks like tuna, and if it isn't tuna that's going to fall back on Subway's supplier which is a well known established brand of tuna.

I wonder if Subway has any recourse for suing this person for defamation at this point.