Updated every Monday!   Subscribe to free weekly newsletter.

KFC Pink Bucket Promo: 50 Cents Donated per Bucket Sold?

In an effort to make the most generous donation ever to the Susan G. Komen for the Cure breast cancer fund, KFC is running a national advertising campaign called “Buckets for the Cure.” For every pink bucket of certain types of chicken, 50 cents will be donated to the cause. [The commercial, originally below, has been removed from YouTube.]

The clear impression created, at least to MrConsumer, is that for every bucket SOLD to CUSTOMERS, 50 cents will be donated. Go back and listen again. It just says “For every bucket,” leaving you to fill in the blank, most likely by adding “sold to customers” or “bought by customers”. But alas, there is fine print, the last line of which reads:

*MOUSE PRINT:

“Customer purchases of KFC buckets during the promotion will not directly increase the total contribution.”

Huh? The rest of the fine print explains that KFC store operators buy the pink buckets and that it is THEIR purchases of empty pink buckets that trigger THEIR giving 50 cents each to Susan G. Komen.

A spokesperson for KFC explained that donations are made at the time the individual restaurant operator purchases the pink buckets, and that since those are the only buckets that will be available to them during the promotion period, consumer purchases of pink buckets will actually but indirectly affect the total donation.

There is just one problem.  Some of the other fine print in the KFC commercial says:

*MOUSE PRINT:

“KFC restaurant operators have contributed 50 cents the Susan G. Komen for the Cure for Komen branded bucket purchased by the operators from April 5, 2010 – May 9, 2010.”

But, on the Susan G. Komen site, the expiration date of the offer for customers to order chicken in pink buckets is three weeks later.

*MOUSE PRINT:

“The pink buckets will be available through May 30, or while supplies last.”

KFC told Mouse Print* that it intends to continue to advertise this promotion after May 9 (until May 23), presumably still saying “together, we can make the largest donation in Komen history”. The problem is this as we see it: consumers could easily be misled into believing that their purchase during that period is increasing the amount of money going to the breast cancer fund when in fact it is not, either directly or indirectly. Remember, the actual donations will have ended on May 9. Not many TV watchers will catch the fine print disclaimer that would instruct them about that fact.

In regard to this, the KFC spokesperson said:

“The voice-over in the commercial states, ‘For every pink bucket of grilled or original recipe, KFC makes a 50 cent contribution to Susan B. Komen for the Cure.’ That is, of course, entirely true. And then, as you pointed out, the additional details are in the legal copy on the commercial and on the bucket.”

What KFC ignores is the concept of “net impression”. What is the net impression that consumers will take away from the commercial? As noted above, we suggest that most consumers are likely to believe their purchase will help the cause. Why else would KFC continue to advertise a charitable tie-in unless it too believed this will help spur consumer sales (and put KFC in a favorable light in customers’ minds)?

There is an advertising regulation in Massachusetts that says, “An advertisement as a whole may be unfair or deceptive although each representation separately construed is literally true.” That may well be the case in this instance.

Share this story:

 


ADV
Updated every Monday!   Subscribe to free weekly newsletter.

The $45 Dishwasher Deal of a Lifetime

Last week, nine states kicked off their “cash for clunker appliances” programs whereby purchasers of certain new energy efficient major appliances could qualify for hefty state rebates funded by federal stimulus dollars.

No program was more generous than the $250 rebate offered by Massachusetts for dishwashers. Of course, there were a lot of fine print requirements.

*MOUSE PRINT:

— Only certain Energy Star models on the state list qualified;
— Only certain retailers were authorized;
— Only purchases between April 22 – May 5 qualified;
— Only (lucky) consumers who received a numbered “rebate reservation” would get money back;

At the appointed hour of 10am on April 22, the phone lines and the website to obtain “rebate reservations” went live, for about five seconds, if that. Immediately, no one could get through by telephone, and the website crashed. [Hint to other states: Do not ever run a program in the manner that Massachusetts did.]

Despite two hours of frustrating redialing and reloading of webpages, some 26,000 Massachusetts residents obtained rebate forms, and 13,000 more were put on a waiting list. All others were turned away.

MrConsumer lost out despite 70 phone calls and innumerable attempts to load the rebate site. But, he was fortunate to make it to the waiting list, because in a move to quell the collective public outrage, the Governor granted wait list people full access to their rebates immediately.

So what kind of deal did MrConsumer strike for his new $600 Maytag dishwasher pictured above at Home Depot?

*MOUSE PRINT:

By using the fine print of store policies, advertised sales, unadvertised rebates, and free delivery, it became the deal of a lifetime.

Now, with fingers crossed, the dishwasher should only clean dishes…

Share this story:

 


ADV
Updated every Monday!   Subscribe to free weekly newsletter.

1000s of Online Shoppers Sold their Souls to Sneaky Store

We have preached for years that you have to read the fine print in advertising, on product labels, and in contracts or you could get snookered.

Well, some 7,500 online shoppers earlier this month didn’t heed that advice and unwittingly sold their souls to a British computer game seller. How could that happen? The company buried this new clause in their terms and conditions:

*MOUSE PRINT:

“By placing an order via this Web site on the first day of the fourth month of the year 2010 Anno Domini, you agree to grant Us a non transferable option to claim, for now and for ever more, your immortal soul. Should We wish to exercise this option, you agree to surrender your immortal soul, and any claim you may have on it, within 5 (five) working days of receiving written notification from gamesation.co.uk or one of its duly authorised minions.”

But, being the consumer-conscious company that they are, Game Station provided a convenient opt-out provision:

*MOUSE PRINT:

“If you a) do not believe you have an immortal soul, b) have already given it to another party, or c) do not wish to grant Us such a license, please click the link below to nullify this sub-clause and proceed with your transaction.”

How many people opted out? A mere 12%. Pretty sad commentary on the number of people who actually read the fine print on websites.

The company, incidentally, is returning all the souls to their rightful owners, since this was an April Fool’s joke.

Thanks to Randy C. for submitting this story idea. You can read more about it here.

Share this story:

 


ADV