Updated every Monday!   Subscribe to free weekly newsletter.

Fish Fillets Plumped Up With Water

MrConsumer was always suspicious that store brand frozen, unbreaded fish fillets were somehow plumped up with water to add to the package weight because after pan frying they would shrink to a fraction of their original size.

Now, in a lawsuit just filed by consumers from three states, food giant, Conagra, is accused of doing just that to two big brands of breaded fish fillets — Van de Kamp’s and Mrs. Paul’s.

fish fillets

While the package says “100% whole fish filtets,” the ingredients statement tells a different story.

*MOUSE PRINT:

ingredients

According to the lawsuit:

The truth is, Defendant pumps up those fish with an industrial filler called sodium tripolyphosphate (“STPP”) and extra water to artificially add weight, which may then ooze out as a white goo when the fish is cooked. STPP, a suspected neurotoxin, is typically used to manufacture things like rubber, paint, and antifreeze. STPP also is used by unscrupulous businesses in the seafood industry to engage in short weighting.

The disclosure in tiny print on the back of the products’ labels about the presence of STPP does not dispel or disclaim to reasonable consumers the bold, prominent statements on the front and back of the products suggesting that the products are composed of ‘100% whole fish

The consumers’ lawyers say the fish is soaked in a solution of STPP which encourages the absorption of water. On average, they say, this adds 13-percent of extra weight to the fish.

Here is a video demonstration of how much a fish fillet shrinks when pan fried by exuding the water it had been plumped up with.

In the lawsuit, the lawyers allege a variety of unfair and deceptive practices under various consumer laws and seek a stop to the practices charged. Conagra has not commented on the pending litigation. And a consumer lawyer told MrConsumer that using STPP may be legal.

What do you think of the practice of bulking up the weight of fish products with water and chemicals?

Share this story:

 


ADV
Updated every Monday!   Subscribe to free weekly newsletter.

Did 7-Eleven Reduce Coffee Cup Sizes?

Last month we reported on a national movie chain seemingly shortchanging customers on beer purchases because the cups could not hold the advertised number of ounces. Now, some people have complained that 7-Eleven coffee cups are shrinking too.

According to their website, the chain of convenience stores sells regular coffee in four sizes: 12-oz. (small), 16-oz. (medium), 20-oz. (large), and 24-oz. (extra large).

*MOUSE PRINT:

7-11 coffee cup sizes

But one consumer noticed a very large indent in the bottom of the extra-large cup and wondered if he was really getting 24-ounces of coffee.

7-11 indent

CBS 8 San Diego reporter Anna Laurel decided to put all the sizes of 7-Eleven coffee cups to the test.

The test revealed that to get the stated amount of coffee, the cups had to be filled right to the brim. And in the case of the extra large 24-ounce cup, it appeared not to be able to hold a full 24 ounces.

We wrote to 7-Eleven’s PR folks to ask their reaction to the video test, and whether they had changed their cup sizes. The company did not respond to either the TV station or to us.

It is not clear to MrConsumer when a company advertises sizes of coffee such as 16 ounces, whether the customer should be getting 16 ounces of black coffee to which they can add milk or cream if desired, or whether it is customary to fill these cups with less than 16 ounces to allow room for that addition. Either way, it seems that having to fill the 7-Eleven cups right to the brim with hot coffee is something most people don’t do and thus they are probably getting less than they paid for. Your thoughts are welcome in the comments.

Share this story:

 


ADV
Updated every Monday!   Subscribe to free weekly newsletter.

Hey Campbell’s, Where’s the Beef?

The Campbell Soup Company was recently sued by a New York consumer who said she was misled by Campbell’s Chunky soup label “Beef with Country Vegetables” which has more vegetables than beef.

*MOUSE PRINT:

Campbell's Chunky Beef & Veg

The ingredients statement above shows that there is more water, carrots and potatoes in the can than beef. In fact, the entire 18.8 ounce can has 15 grams of protein, which is only about two ounces of beef!

One has to wonder if Campbell’s took lessons from The Three Stooges on how to make cheap soup?

By contrast, Progresso beef and vegetable soup, has beef as the primary solid ingredient after broth and water.

The consumer’s lawyer further argues that the product should be labeled “Vegetables and Beef” since vegetables predominate over beef. He may be thinking of label rules that require On-Cor, for example, to call the product below “gravy and turkey” because there is more gravy in it than turkey:
en-cor turkey
I don’t know if those rules apply here. The product in question is beef soup and it probably doesn’t even need to have pieces of beef in it.

I think the chances of this case succeeding are… m’m, m’m not good.

Share this story:

 


ADV