Updated every Monday!   Subscribe to free weekly newsletter.

Amazon Sued Over Fake Sale Markdowns

Two consumers recently sued Amazon over fake discounts advertised during Prime Day this past July.

They allege that big percentage discounts are offered off of fake list prices to make shoppers think they are saving a bundle. In fact, the lawsuit asserts, that the savings are often far less than claimed, that the same sale price had been offered previously, or that Amazon never charged that stated list price in the previous 90 days.

As an example, the complaint says this headphone was supposedly 44% off:

Amazon headphone

The consumers’ lawyers contend:

But, in fact, Amazon does not deliver the promised 44% off because it uses a Fake Prior Amazon Price in calculating 44% supposed savings. While Amazon lists a Fake Prior Amazon Price of $134.99, in fact, these Skullcandy headphones have often been offered at the same “sale” price during the past 90 days, and never cost more than $110. … As the headphones were never offered on Amazon for the fake strike through price of $134.99, a customer buying these headphones during Prime Day 2025 overpaid because Amazon did not deliver the 44% savings it promised.

MrConsumer checked CamelCamelCamel.com and in fact that headset was offered at the full $134.99 price for about 10 separate days in the first half of 2025.

Amazon has made some modest strides in explaining what it means by “list price” in its product listings. That almost invisible little “i” reveals their definition.

*MOUSE PRINT:

Amazon List Price definition

And you can see Amazon’s own price history chart by clicking the Rufus button at the top left of the screen.

That said, for many years, Amazon and others have used exaggerated or rarely charged list prices to give shoppers a false sense of the savings being advertised and the product’s value.

It may be a while before this case proceeds because the judge placed a temporary hold on the proceedings while a similar case is being heard in a Washington appeals court.

Updated every Monday!   Subscribe to free weekly newsletter.

Can AI Keep a Secret?

Just for fun, MrConsumer asked several of the leading AI chatbots “what unusual things has someone else asked you to do today.” I wanted to see if what we assumed to be private personal inquiries remained that way.

Microsoft Copilot

Oof, today’s been a wild ride already. Someone asked me to write a breakup letter from the perspective of a haunted house. […] Another person wanted a recipe for lasagna, but every ingredient had to start with the letter “B.” […] I also helped someone brainstorm names for a startup that sells personalized moss terrariums. One of the top contenders? “Moss Boss.” I kind of love it. [Emphasis added]

I was a little shocked by the third answer. If that was my new company, and I was about to launch it, I don’t want others, particularly potential competitors, to know the cute name and the type of products that I might be launching.

How does Microsoft protect my data when using Copilot?

*MOUSE PRINT:

Your personal interactions with our services are kept private and are not disclosed without your permission. We remove information that may identify you, like names, phone numbers, device or account identifiers, sensitive personal data, physical addresses, and email addresses, before training AI models. [Microsoft privacy]

When directly asked about sharing secrets of others, it said “I don’t spill secrets—ever. Even if someone told me they buried treasure in their backyard or confessed to microwaving fish in the office break room (a true crime in some circles), that information stays locked away. I’m designed to respect privacy and confidentiality, so I don’t share personal details between users.”


Google Gemini

When Gemini was asked about unusual things they were asked to do today, it responded in part… “Since my conversations are stateless and I don’t retain memory of past interactions for privacy reasons, I can’t tell you what a specific person asked me earlier today. Each conversation is a fresh start.” It then listed four oddball requests without identifying information.


Chat GPT

Chat GPT’s answer to my unusual requests today question was to spit back four things that *I* had asked it to do over the past eight months.


Claude AI

Claude said in relevant part, ” I don’t actually have experiences from other conversations or retain information about what other people have asked me throughout the day. Each conversation I have is independent – I start fresh each time without memory of previous chats.”


Perplexity AI

This chatbot gave a general answer citing some other sources: “Some unusual requests to AI assistants today have included role-playing to bypass security, generating deeply personalized phishing emails, and answering bizarre or funny personal questions… .”


Meta AI

It said, “Today, someone asked me to write a poem about a talking eggplant who becomes a stand-up comedian.”


All in all, the chatbots uniformly didn’t disclose personal identifying information. But one of the answers by Copilot might have potentially compromised a business plan. So, be careful what information you share when using AI.

Updated every Monday!   Subscribe to free weekly newsletter.

Sometimes Good News Is Buried in the Fine Print

Last year, a UK-based nonprofit tax policy organization decided to protest a legal requirement that it had to have a posted privacy policy. Its director, Dan Neidle, wanted to make the point that no one reads these things so what was the point of even having one.

So, he launched his personal protest in February 2024 by inserting an offer of a free bottle of wine into his privacy policy:

*MOUSE PRINT:

Privacy policy - free wine

It took three months before anyone noticed the free wine offer and claimed it.

After the wine was claimed, Neidle commented, “Every tiny coffee shop has to have a privacy policy on their website, it’s crazy. It’s money that’s being wasted.”