Updated every Monday!   Subscribe to free weekly newsletter.

First They Shrunk It, Now Turkey Hill Skimped on It

Two years ago, we reported that Turkey Hill practiced a bit of shrinkflation on their standard 48-ounce cartons of ice cream by reducing them to 46 ounces.

Now our reader Michael C. says they are pulling another fast one. Can you spot the change?

*MOUSE PRINT:

Turkey Hill ice cream changes

Turkey Hill cleverly deleted the words “ice cream” from the red band on the face of the container and substituted the word “quality.” This allowed the company to subtly turn many of their premium ice cream flavors into frozen dairy desserts — a less rich and cheaper to make product. The words “frozen dairy dessert” were added in minute type on the bottom left.

Under federal law, to be called “ice cream,” the product must contain at least 10% milk fat. Based on the nutrition labels of the old and new product, cream, which used to be the second ingredient in their real ice cream, moved near the end in their new version.

*MOUSE PRINT:

Nutrition Fact labels

We asked the company a number of questions including why they made this change and did so so inconspicuously. They did not reply to multiple inquiries.

Perhaps the company needs to rename this flavor:

Not Much Cream

Your comments are welcome. (Bug preventing comments being able to be posted is fixed.)

Share this story:

 


ADV
Updated every Monday!   Subscribe to free weekly newsletter.

Nonsmoking Hotel Guests Charged Erroneous $500 Smoking Fee

Complaints are beginning to pile up about hotels that has been assessing some guests a $500 smoking fee when they check out. The fee comes as a complete surprise to them because they claim they don’t smoke.

Travel writer Zach Griff had just such an experience at The Pell by Hyatt hotel near Newport, Rhode Island this summer over the July 4th holiday. He writes:

During checkout, I reviewed the hotel folio (which I always recommend doing!) and noticed a $500 smoking charge on the bill.

The thing is, I’ve never smoked, and certainly wasn’t planning to start during the holiday weekend with my [eight-month-old] daughter in tow!

He raised the issue with the front desk, but got a hostile response and no immediate resolution. So he posted a video online and discovered that others had been wrongfully charged a huge smoking fee too at that hotel and others.

The hotel warns on its website that there is a fine for smoking in the room:

*MOUSE PRINT:

No Smoking

We checked some review sites, like Trip Advisor and Yelp, and sure enough others found themselves in the same predicament.

At the center of the controversy is a product called Rest Sensor which is a smoke detector that sends a timestamped notice to the hotel billing system whenever it detects smoke in a guest room. The manufacturer’s pitch to hoteliers to adopt their system stresses the financial benefit to the hotel and the accuracy of the system:

*MOUSE PRINT:

Rest Sensor income

Rest Sensor accuracy

After learning of the writer’s social media video, the hotel general manager reached out to tell him he would make sure his credit card is not charged. And the hotel said he would be getting a refund. As a travel writer, he worried about all the other guests he read about who were fighting for their money back from this and other hotels.

We asked Hyatt corporate management to comment on this issue, but a spokesperson for The Pell responded instead:

A top priority is always to create a comfortable environment for all guests and colleagues. The Pell is a non-smoking property (including cigarettes, vapes and e-cigarettes) and uses sensor technology to help maintain a smoke-free atmosphere and high air quality standards within the hotel. This policy is communicated throughout the hotel and in the guestrooms. At this time, we are looking into this situation further and working to extend assistance to guests who have expressed prior related concerns.

Your comments on this issue are welcome below.


====================================
SIDEBAR: Connie Francis and MrConsumer
====================================

Connie Francis passed away last week at age 87.

Four decades ago when MrConsumer was a consumer reporter at Channel 7 in Boston, he had the opportunity to meet Connie Francis who was being interviewed on the daily talk show of which he was a part. Whenever a celebrity visited, I would always ask if they would be willing to do a “consumer” interview about their purchasing habits, etc.

She said she didn’t think she would be a good candidate. So I gave her an example of a question I might ask. “Let’s say you had a relatively new toaster and it went on the blink… what would you do?” She responded: “I’d have someone get me a new one!”

I smiled but we didn’t do the interview.

Share this story:

 


ADV
Updated every Monday!   Subscribe to free weekly newsletter.

Does CVS Have a New “Scan Right Guarantee?”

MrConsumer was shocked to see a counter sign at each register at his local CVS in Massachusetts a few weeks ago that proclaimed:

cvs scan right guarantee

Under the CVS Scan Right Guarantee, if an item scans higher than the shelf price sign or price in their ad, you get the item free up to $4 or you get $4 off if the item was more expensive.

I asked the both the cashier and the manager about it, and they acted like this was the first time they were seeing it.

Checking with the PR folks at CVS, they discovered that the signs were only meant to be posted in California and somehow they had erroneously shown up in Massachusetts. Good thing, in a certain sense, because our price accuracy guarantee (which MrConsumer authored almost 40 years ago) calls for getting up to a $10 grocery item free (or $10 off a higher-priced item) if it scans wrong. Some states like Michigan have their own bounty law for scanning errors. And some other chains have a similar guarantee.

But what’s this California only CVS price guarantee? There is no reference to it all on the CVS website. In 2011, CVS agreed to settle a case brought by the Los Angeles, Riverside, and Ventura county District Attorney’s offices for almost two million dollars. The company also had to establish a price guarantee. Then in 2015 and again in 2018, the same California DAs settled with CVS for another $2.4-million for scanner errors in each of those years.

This all goes to show that we as shoppers need to be vigilant at the checkout to ensure we are charged the price that was represented to us at the shelf.

======================================
UPDATE: San Diego Digital Coupon Ordinance
======================================

Back in April, San Diego passed a city ordinance requiring supermarkets to provide printed versions of digital coupons in-store for the many people who either don’t have or can’t use the internet or smartphones. Then, a few weeks ago, after lobbying by supermarkets, they were about to amend the ordinance in such a way as to make it completely meaningless because it would not apply to any digital coupons offered via the store’s loyalty card program. Councilors did not understand that all digital coupons only work through such programs.

The day before the vote was to take place, MrConsumer wrote to each city councilor explaining that they were about to make a huge mistake. To his surprise, they listened and deleted the exclusion that swallowed up the rule. And they made compliance easier for stores by allowing them to choose one of several methods by which they could offer equivalent in-store savings to those shoppers who don’t use digital coupons. Whewwww!

The San Diego ordinance gets a second reading soon and is slated to go into effect in October.

Share this story:

 


ADV