Updated every Monday!   Subscribe to free weekly newsletter.

Skimpy Peanut Butter — Part 1

Skippy NaturalThe above title does not contain a typo. This is part one of a story about Skippy, the most famous brand of peanut butter.

You may not have noticed, but Skippy has a new product on the shelves (or at least new to MrConsumer), called Skippy Natural.  Many would expect that this product will be nothing but ground peanuts and salt.

Not so fast.

*MOUSE PRINT:  Here is the ingredients listing:

ingredients

How can this be?  The recipe is like regular Skippy: peanuts, sugar, oil, and salt. First, the federal government does not have strict rules about use of the word “natural”.  So we shouldn’t assume it means just nuts, even though competitors like Smuckers Natural Creamy peanut butter and Teddie Old Fashioned Natural peanut butter contain only nuts and salt.  More interesting is another bit of Mouse Print* that most people miss:

*MOUSE PRINT:

spread

The product is not really peanut butter, but rather “peanut butter spread.”  What in the world is peanut butter spread?  It is a fanciful term used by product manufacturers when they cannot legally call their product “peanut butter” because it does not meet the federal standard of identity for peanut butter. 

§ 164.150 Peanut butter.
(a) Peanut butter is the food prepared by grinding one of the shelled and roasted peanut ingredients provided for by paragraph (b) of this section, to which may be added safe and suitable seasoning and stabilizing ingredients provided for by paragraph (c) of this section, but such seasoning and stabilizing ingredients do not in the aggregate exceed 10 percent of the weight of the finished food. 

Translation: To be called peanut butter, the recipe must include at least 90% peanuts, and can include a stabilizer to keep the product from separating.  If the stabilizer is oil, it must be hydrogenated or partially hydrogenated.  And therein lies the reason(s) it can’t be called peanut butter.  It uses non-hydrogenated palm oil — an oil higher in saturated fat — than the type used in regular Skippy as an emulsifier.  Here is how the company explained it:

“Since Skippy Natural uses palm oil as a stabilizing ingredient, which as an oil is not hydrogenated or partially hydrogenated, Skippy Natural cannot legally be claimed a Peanut Butter, as per the FDA. However, Skippy Natural does qualify as a Peanut Butter Spread, just like many of the Reduced Fat and Low Carb peanut butters on the market. Skippy Natural is made with ingredients that are minimally and non-chemically processed. The FDA does not have a definition for natural products, like it does for organic foods, but the general ruling is that natural foods should be minimally and non-chemically processed.”

After tasting Skippy Natural, and not sensing much of a peanuty flavor, MrConsumer wondered whether the company also tinkered with the amount of nuts in the recipe since they no longer had to meet the 90% standard anyway. It took two attempts to find out whether they still put in at least 90% peanuts.  Here is their answer:

“We do not provide percentages for ingredients used in our products. This is considered proprietary information.”

So, if you want natural peanut butter, defined as just peanuts and nothing else but maybe salt, better stick with another brand.

Part 2 of “Skimpy” peanut butter will focus on a new packaging trick used by the company.

Share this story:

 


ADV
Updated every Monday!   Subscribe to free weekly newsletter.

“Mouse Print” Could Strip Disney of Mickey

Old Mickey, LA TimesFor a change of pace this week, we look at “mouse print”, literally — the copyright notice used by the Walt Disney company to protect its most famous cartoon character, Mickey Mouse. It seems the company may have failed to dot all the i’s and cross all the t’s in the early days, and that could thrust Mickey, or at least an early version of him, into the public domain.

As reported in the LA Times, here is how the story begins:

Disney’s Rights to Young Mickey Mouse May be Wrong

Film credits from the 1920s reveal imprecision in copyright claims that some experts say could invalidate Disney’s long-held copyright.

By Joseph Menn, Los Angeles Times Staff Writer
August 22, 2008
He is the world’s most famous personality, better known in this country than anyone living or dead, real or fictional. Market researchers say his 97% recognition rate in the U.S. edges out even Santa Claus.

He is the one — and, for now, only — Mickey Mouse.

As Mickey turns 80 this fall, the most beloved rodent in show business is widely regarded as a national treasure. But he is owned lock, stock and trademark ears by the corporate heirs of his genius creator, Walt Disney.

Brand experts reckon his value to today’s Walt Disney Co. empire at more than $3 billion. Acts of Congress have extended Mickey’s copyright so long that they provoked a Supreme Court challenge, making Mickey the ultimate symbol of intellectual property.

All signs pointed to a Hollywood ending with Disney and Mickey Mouse living happily ever after — at least until a grumpy former employee looked closely at fine print long forgotten in company archives.

Please visit the LA Times to read the full story, lest Mouse Print* be guilty of copyright infringement.

Share this story:

 


ADV
Updated every Monday!   Subscribe to free weekly newsletter.

Delta is Ready with New Fees for Frequent Fliers

Over the past few weeks, some airlines announced new fees and policies for members of their frequent flier programs. Delta’s new charges for Skymiles members somehow seemed more obnoxious than most:

*MOUSE PRINT:

— Awards booked less than 21 days before travel will incur fees of $75, $100, or $150; while booking 21 or more days in advance is fee-free.

— There will be a $25 fuel surcharge for domestic flights, and $50 internationally.

— Miles needed for a domestic coach roundtrip will now be 25,000, 40,000 or 60,000. (Funny how the cheap 25,000 point seats always seem to be unavailable.) The site cleverly makes you think they lowered the number of miles needed by displaying the number for a ONE-WAY trip rather than the traditional (and still required) roundtrip:

— If one segment of your trip is on a partner airline, there is an additional $25 partner fee.

— Miles will now expire two years from the date of the last qualifying activity in your account.  Previously, they gave you until December 31st of the year two years after your last activity.  The effect of this to further shorten the life of your miles, so they can wipe out your account sooner.

Remember the good old days when a free ticket really was a free tickert? Well, at least as the New Times says, the airsickness bags are still free.

Share this story:

 


ADV