Updated every Monday!   Subscribe to free weekly newsletter.

Does Spectrum Capture Your Voice Then Secretly Use It for ID Purposes?

Biometric Voice PatternA regular Consumer World reader from Florida who we’ll call N.W. recently wrote to us about a disturbing discovery when she called the technical support department of Spectrum, her cable provider.

Rather than ask a whole series of verification questions when first connected, N.W. explained that the representative immediately identified her by her voice. She asked how this was possible, and was told that customers’ voices are recorded for Spectrum’s use. One of the newest uses is to digitize a person’s voice and speech pattern to create a unique digital identity or voiceprint that can act like an automatic password when they call again.

According to our consumer, Spectrum claimed they had notified her about their new Voice ID security system via email, but when she inquired what email address they had on record for her, they admitted they had none.

N.W. is a very privacy- and security-sensitive person and was distressed by Spectrum’s use of this technology without her knowledge or affirmative consent.

According to a press release and a fact sheet that Spectrum issued last May at the launch of the feature, Voice ID was supposed to be an “optional” and “completely voluntary” service.

*MOUSE PRINT:

Spectrum optional

Spectrum voluntary

Obviously, their Voice ID system only works if the company can hear or record the customer’s voice and then analyze it. Most companies’ customer service lines announce that “your call may be monitored or recorded for training or quality control purposes.” Anecdotally, Spectrum may not always do this in all cases, but it has a disclosure in its terms of service:

*MOUSE PRINT:

a. Recording of Communications. Subscriber acknowledges and agrees that all communications between Subscriber and Spectrum may be recorded or monitored by Spectrum for quality assurance or other purposes [emphasis added] subject to applicable law.

To get a straight answer as to what happened in N.W.’s case (and perhaps to others), we asked the PR folks at Charter Communications, the cable operator that provides Spectrum service. It has over 31 million customers in 41 states.

After doing their research, N.W. got a call from Spectrum. According to her, the Spectrum rep admitted that the company had recorded voices for Voice ID without customers’ knowledge and consent, they were very apologetic, and said there was no excuse for what happened.

So could N.W. be the only customer they did this to? We asked the company how widespread the problem was, why it was done without consent, whether reps were incentivized to enroll customers in Voice ID, and what were they going to do now to remedy the situation. They issued this short statement but declined to comment further:

“We take customer security and privacy very seriously and our policy is, and always has been, to obtain customer consent prior to enrollment in Voice ID. In the event the enrollment is disputed, we will remediate the situation immediately by unenrolling the customer and deleting their voice file, as has been done in this instance.”

From a legal standpoint, there are two key issues. Does Spectrum properly alert callers when they are recording or monitoring customer conversations and the reasons for doing so? And did Spectrum enroll other customers in Voice ID without permission? The strongest biometric protection laws (that govern a third party’s use of your fingerprint, iris scan, voice, face, etc.) prohibit collecting and using such identifiers without first notifying the subjects and getting their affirmative consent. And remember that in Spectrum’s case, they explicitly told customers they would not enable Voice ID without permission.

As of mid-2021, five states (Illinois, Arkansas, California, Texas, and Washington) had specific laws governing biometrics. Some other states apply their generic privacy laws to biometric issues, while still others have pending legislation on the subject. (See state list.)

So how do you feel about a company recording your voice, and creating and using a voiceprint to identify you? Should you have to give your permission for them to do this? And do you think that N.W. was the only customer who was involuntarily opted into Voice ID? Enter your comments below.

And, as an experiment, if you have Spectrum service, considering calling customer service and asking if Voice ID is or is not enabled on your account. You can report your results here.

For an interesting article on the commercial use of your voice, check out Professor Joseph Turow’s opinion piece recently published in the New York Times.

Share this story:

 


ADV
Updated every Monday!   Subscribe to free weekly newsletter.

Here We Downsize Again — Year-End 2021

NOTE: The next new Mouse Print* story will be published on January 10.

We end the year with another round of products that have been downsized from their former larger-size packages. Of course, the new-fangled name for this is “shrinkflation.” But, no matter what you call it, it still is a sneaky way to pass on a price increase.

Crest Toothpaste

I don’t know how anyone can keep track of toothpaste tube sizes these days. They just keep getting smaller and smaller. Here, Crest 3D White lost over eight percent of its contents, going from 4.1 ounces to just 3.8. Thanks to Richard G. for spotting this change.

*MOUSE PRINT:

Crest 3D White


Milky Way

Candy is another big category for downsizing. This time, it is Milky Way Fun Size bars that went from 11.24 oz. down to 10.65 oz. There is just a little less fun in each bag. Thanks to M.F. for spotting the change.

*MOUSE PRINT:

Milky Way


Twinings Tea CORRECTION

Even the stately boxes of Earl Grey tea by Twinings got hit by the shrink-ray, it appeared, according to reader M.F. In this case, it looked like the 25-count boxes were downsized to just 20.

*MOUSE PRINT:

Twinings tea

However, a representative for Twinings just reached out to us to say that Twinings tea has NOT in fact been downsized. They apparently sell both the 20 and 25-count boxes of tea bags to different retailers. So depending on where you shop, you may find either the smaller box or the larger one. We regret the error.


Gain Detergent

P&G apparently has been tinkering with the cup size or the formula for Gain laundry detergent. The new bottles contain 11 ounces less than the old ones, but supposedly you still get the same 107 loads out of every container. Of course, no one ever gets the number of loads promised on the label out of a bottle of detergent. That count is usually for a tiny load only when filling the cup a fraction of the way up to a line that is virtually invisible.

*MOUSE PRINT:

Gain detergent


Aleve

Finally, if all these shrinking products give you a headache, don’t turn to the 100-caplet size bottles of Aleve. They now only have 90 pills.

*MOUSE PRINT:

Aleve


Kirkland Paper Towels UPsized

Last May, we showed you how Costco had downsized their Kirkland paper towels from 160 sheets on a roll to 140. [Original story] Well, fast-forward to this past September, and reader David F. reported that Costco had restored the missing 20 sheets to their paper towel rolls, so they are back up to 160 sheets. Perhaps it was all the bad publicity that surrounded that downsizing that convinced the company to bring back the previous larger size. In any event, hat’s off to Costco.

Kirkland paper towels


If you find an example of a product that has downsized, please submit a sharp photo of the old and new packages side-by-side to Edgar (at symbol) MousePrint.org . Thanks.

Share this story:

 


ADV
Updated every Monday!   Subscribe to free weekly newsletter.

AMEX Cash Back Offers: Too Good to Be True?

American Express is known for promoting very generous cash back offers such as ones that provide $10 back if you spend $10 or more at a small business. Here are some other recent examples, good deals for sure:

Amex typical offers

Last week, however, people on a bargain discussion board couldn’t believe their eyes when some of them found this offer in their AMEX account:

*MOUSE PRINT:

Amex 1000 off 1000

That’s right, spend $1,000 in one or more purchases and American Express will give you back a $1,000 statement credit. And you could do it three times! People couldn’t believe it. Then it got even crazier as other people checked their accounts. Most got nothing or a promise of bonus points. But others hit the jackpot, like this lucky cardholder.

*MOUSE PRINT:

AMEX 6000

Holy ****. Spend $3,000 and get back $6,000!? Keep in mind, this is on the genuine American Express website on a page of offers you see only after you log in to your account. People speculated that the company had been hacked, or there was a typo because the payback was probably meant to be “points” rather than “dollars,” or that some rogue employee decided to maliciously take revenge on the company. Others thought it was real, kept screenshots of the offer they signed up for, and hoped that AMEX would make good on it.

We asked the PR folks at American Express for an explanation. A spokesperson for the company told Consumer World:

“Due to a technical error, a small number of American Express Card Members were shown and subsequently enrolled in a statement credit offer for an incorrect amount. We quickly caught the error and removed the offer. American Express will honor this offer for the limited number of Card Members who enrolled.”

Wow! Hat’s off to American Express for honoring the erroneous offers. And merry Christmas to the several hundred cardholders who were lucky enough to get and enroll in them before they were pulled.

Share this story:

 


ADV