Updated every Monday!   Subscribe to free weekly newsletter.

May 9, 2011

Dove Men’s Deodorant — 48 Hour Protection?

Filed under: Food/Groceries,Health — Edgar (aka MrConsumer) @ 5:13 am

How long does your deodorant/anti-perspirant last before you begin to sweat? Five minutes? Two hours? Twenty-four hours?

Unilever, the maker of Dove Men + Care, claims on its website that its products last 48 hours!

Wow… two whole days. This must have an industrial-strength anti-perspirant in it.

Coincidentally, MrConsumer received a free sample of Dove for men just two days earlier, and it was marked “24 Hour” protection on it. Had they already improved the product since sending out the sample? Nah. Did they come up with 48 hours by adding together 24 hours for the left armpit and 24 hours for the right? Let’s hope not.

A trip to the drugstore surely would clear up the confusion. So MrConsumer applied the sample product, and off to CVS he walked.

*MOUSE PRINT:

There they were, the 24-hour version and 48-hour version, side by side, same UPC code, and same price. Maybe the back of the product would provide answers.

*MOUSE PRINT:

Did the new one have twice the anti-perspirant? Nope. It had the exact same amount. And the rest of the ingredients were identical too.

So how in the world can a company all of sudden claim that its deodorant lasts twice as long as before — an unrealistic sounding 48 hours — when no apparent changes have been made to it? Mouse Print* asked Unilever and their PR firm.

1. How do you justify claiming the new Men + Care antiperspirants and deodorants now offer 48 hour protection, without adding any additional active ingredient or changing the formula, particularly when competitors’ products with 30% MORE of the same active ingredient (19%) only claim 24 hour protection?

“Our Dove Men + Care deodorant and anti-perspirant products are tough on sweat, not on skin and we are proud to be able make the claim that they offer 48-hour protection. The foundation of our success is built on consumer insight and world class innovation and our specific formulas have been clinically tested following FDA guidelines yielding results that show they are able to provide 48-hours of protection. We stand behind our product claims and are unable to comment on our competitors. ”

2. Why did you change the claim to 48 hours?

“In December 2010, we launched Dove Men + Care Deodorants and Antiperspirants with a 24-hour protection claim on pack and a 48 hour protection claim pending. In February 2011 we received approval of the 48 hour protection claim against odor and wetness and have changed the claim language on all of our packaging to communicate this new level of protection.” — Unilever spokesperson, Unilever Research & Development, Deodorants.

You can judge how well the company responded to the questions posed versus how much spin they provided. Without going into great additional detail, the PR spokesperson admitted in a phone call that the product had not changed at all, and that is was not the FDA who gave them the “approval” of the 48 hour claim.

The FDA does in fact publish guidelines on how to test the effectiveness of antiperspirant products. While the particular procedures are suggested rather than required, the relevant section of the guidelines provides that for extra efficacy products for claims of enhanced duration:

The test will demonstrate that, with high probability, at least 50 percent of the target population will obtain a sweat reduction of at least 30 percent.

Mouse Print* had asked the company a third question — whether a majority of the men testing the product agreed that it lasted 48 hours — but the company did not respond to that in its email.

Back at CVS, MrConsumer became very excited having found that some products on display were marked 24 hours, while others were marked 48 hours, but the ingredients were identical. He rushed home, walking briskly, but his armpits began to drip with sweat, not two hours after application of the sample stick he had received. So much for the anti-wetness claims, he thought.

And as to its deodorizing efficacy, nothing on the label indicates this product is effective at covering up the fishy smell of its own advertising claims.

Share this story:



 

 

  ADV


• • •

13 Comments

  1. Reminds me of the 4G claims now being made by cell phone companies. They now have 4G speeds, because they worked on having the standards lowered to meet their current 3G speeds.

    Comment by spstanley — May 9, 2011 @ 8:31 am
  2. Essentially it comes down to two things: They lied and they are full of _____ .

    Comment by Rick — May 9, 2011 @ 12:21 pm
  3. The test group was kept in a meat locker watching the winter olympics during the entire 48-hour test period.

    Comment by PC — May 9, 2011 @ 4:40 pm
  4. It doesn’t seem unreasonable to me that they started selling it as 24-hour protection while performing the required tests to claim 48-hours. Once they had data to support a 48-hour claim, of course they would change the label to reflect that.

    Comment by z — May 9, 2011 @ 5:58 pm
  5. Do we really need all these smell/anti-smell products. The number of adverts for room deodorizers and odorizers is crazy. Just clean occasionally (and in the case of deodorant – bathe).

    Comment by Alan — May 9, 2011 @ 8:21 pm
  6. Right. Nobody said the test subjects have to have armpits did they?

    Comment by ryan — May 10, 2011 @ 1:27 am
  7. Seems to me like they answered the questions pretty well. For the first question, they can justify making the 48-hour claim because they tested it. (How else would anyone justify it?) For the second question, they changed the advertising because further testing of the product revealed that it’s actually more effective than originally claimed.

    I imagine it was in-house testers who approved the 48-hour claim. I expect the FDA would only bother doing its own tests if there were complaints about the truthfulness of the advertising claims.

    Comment by Rob Kennedy — May 10, 2011 @ 1:54 am
  8. If you bathe or shower daily then why bother with 48-hour protection?

    Comment by Peter — May 10, 2011 @ 6:37 am
  9. It’s important not to smell like a human. So bathe daily and use lots of soaps and deodorants that smell like animals, plants, or anything but a human. And let’s not forget to shut off those pesky sweat glands. We don’t really need to cool the body using perspiration when we’ve got air conditioning everywhere!

    Comment by John — May 10, 2011 @ 3:09 pm
  10. Really Rob Kennedy? I assume since you’re name is Rob you are a man. Have you actually used a deodorant that lasted for 12 hours much less 48 hours???

    The whole point of this Mouse Print is that even the notion of 48 hour deodorant is ludicrous.
    I actually think it is interesting that we have become so accustomed to the “24 hour” labels that we don’t even blink at that any more.

    Comment by ryan — May 11, 2011 @ 1:13 am
  11. I can say, without a doubt, that this deodorant does not last 48 hours. It doesn’t even last 24 hours. I work from home (air conditioned), so am not super taxing on my deodorant. So why, since I started using Dove Men+Care, do I wreak like a loaf of Limburger cheese the day after (and sometimes by the end of the same day)? When I switch it up and use the Gillette I’ve been using for years, no stink problem at all, even if I decide to be a hog and skip a shower day. There is something wrong with this Dove Men+Care deodorant, and I, for one, don’t recommend it whatsoever.

    Comment by Russ — July 8, 2011 @ 8:47 pm
  12. Im actually a little surprisedthis product is received the way it is – this worked really well for me – I generally shower every other day and this is the best deoderant I’ve eve used; granted, I usually put it on every day out of habit but even when I don’t it’s great

    Comment by Andrew — October 3, 2011 @ 12:31 pm
  13. i have the Dove Deodarnt (roll on)and i can say that it works. I live in Cape Town, South Africa and we are still in summer. the dove deodrant lasts the whole day inspite of the heat.

    I have used other Doedrants in the past but it did not work.

    i don’t think that I will use anything else again.

    Thank you
    Ashley.

    Comment by Ashley Natus — March 8, 2012 @ 10:04 am

Comments RSS

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.

Powered by: WordPressPrivacy Policy
Mouse Print exposes the strings and catches buried in the fine print of advertising.
Copyright © 2006-2019. All rights reserved. Advertisements are copyrighted by their respective owners.