Updated every Monday!   Subscribe to free weekly newsletter.

May 30, 2016

Kind Nutrition Bars — A “Healthy” Choice?

Filed under: Food/Groceries,Health,Retail — Edgar (aka MrConsumer) @ 5:58 am

Last year, the Food and Drug Administration sent a warning letter to Kind, LLC, a maker of supposedly “healthy” nutrition snack bars and similar foods.

The agency singled out four of their nutrition bars as making problematic claims not in compliance with FDA regulations: Kind Fruit & Nut Almond & Apricot, Kind Fruit & Nut Almond & Coconut, Kind Plus Peanut Butter Dark Chocolate + Protein, and Kind Plus Dark Chocolate Cherry Cashew + Antioxidants.

KIND box

Take the above dark chocolate peanut butter bar, for example. They say this bar is “misbranded” because the product labels bear nutrient content claims, but the products do not meet the requirements to make such claims. Specifically, the label makes the claim “Healthy and tasty, convenient and wholesome” in connection with statements such as: “good source of fiber,” “no trans fats,” and “7g protein.”

And their website says:

KIND Peanut Butter Dark Chocolate + Protein is a healthy & satisfying blend of peanuts and dark chocolate. Each bar contains 7 grams of protein, which promotes satiety and strengthens bones, muscles and skin.


The problem according to the FDA is that you can only use the term “healthy” as an implied nutrient content claim on the label or in the labeling of a food provided that the food, among other things, is “low saturated fat” [i.e., the food has a saturated fat content of 1 g or less per Reference Amount Customarily Consumed (RACC) and no more than 15 percent of the calories are from saturated fat]. But according to their nutrition label, the product fails this test, with three and half times the saturated fat and four times the calories allowed from saturated fat.


The product also cannot be called “anti-oxidant rich” because it does not contain at least 20% of the daily requirement of nutrients recognized for their anti-oxidant qualities. It only contains 15% of the Daily Value (DV) of vitamin E and 0% of vitamin C and vitamin A.

In addition, there are technical problems with their “no trans fat” and “good source of fiber claims.”

Virtually all of these violations are not obvious to purchasers who probably see this product as some sort of health or nutrition bar. And one has to wonder whether if this is all about the marketing of candy bars cloaked with seeming health benefits.

Fast forward to May 2016: The FDA seems to have had a change of heart and has told Kind that it can return the word “healthy” to its bars. In the meantime, the agency says it is going to re-evaluate its two-decade-old regulations governing the word “healthy” and may come out with new rules. That is sure kind of the FDA.

Share this story:


• • •


  1. The FDA is not a group of kindly scientists who are the protectors of American’s diets. The group is made up of political appointees who are often lawyers for large food companies and have the power to influence laws like the definition of healthy. That is why pop tarts and sugary cereals are “healthy” while kind bars, salmon and avocado are not.

    Comment by JC — May 30, 2016 @ 7:59 am
  2. Saturated fat is not ‘unhealthy’ in itself. That myth has long been debunked. All those other claims do seem dubious though.

    I agree that the FDA should update what ‘healthy’ means on food labels.

    Comment by Wayne R — May 30, 2016 @ 8:10 am
  3. The FDA is no longer as trustworthy as it once was, since it is made up largely by industry insiders, PLUS it is often held hostage with threats by Congress to withhold funds whenever those congress-critters deem it has overstepped the boundaries set by their corporate puppet-masters.

    Comment by Sunny H — May 30, 2016 @ 9:53 am
  4. With the continued changes in what the government decides is “healthy” and part of a “correct diet”, I’m often reminded of the Woody Allen movie ‘Sleeper’ where the protagonist wakes up decades in the future. He is given potato chips and cigarettes because the government has determined that they are healthy for people.

    Comment by Marc — May 31, 2016 @ 7:33 am

Comments RSS

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.

Powered by: WordPressPrivacy Policy
Copyright © 2006-2018. All rights reserved. Advertisements are copyrighted by their respective owners.