Health

Updated every Monday!   Subscribe to free weekly newsletter.

Plumped Chickens: You Are Paying for Water

plumped1If a butcher puts his thumb on the scale, you wind up paying for meat you never actually receive. 

Some chicken producers are now doing something similar when processing their chicken. On the left is a typical package of chicken you might find in any supermarket. It says “100% natural” breasts (with some rib meat).  You expect there to be nothing but chicken in the package in all likelihood. However, look at the fine print disclosure:
 

plumped2

*MOUSE PRINT: “with up to 15% natural chicken broth.”  What’s that?  Primarily salt and water.  So you are really paying $3.99 a pound for the water that comprises 15% of the package weight.

Current labeling law still allows the chicken to be labeled “all natural” because water and salt are natural ingredients, irrespective of the fact that they are being injected into the birds to make them weigh more.

Makers of plumped chickens say the extra water and salt help make the chicken more moist and tender. While that may be true, they are not eager to tell you that a four-ounce serving of enhanced chicken may have eight times the chicken’s normal sodium content — equivalent to the salt in a large serving of fast food french fries.

For more information on plumped chickens, here is a recent LA Times article, a video on the plumping process from CBS News, and Foster Farms’ wonderfully clever website, “Say No to Plumping“.

Updated every Monday!   Subscribe to free weekly newsletter.

Cheerios Helps Lower Cholesterol 4%; No, Make that 10%; Do I Hear 20%?

While we have come to accept that products containing oats may help to lower cholesterol, the claims can be very confusing.

Take Cheerios, for example. On the left is a box purchased a couple of months ago, and on the right is a box purchased last week.

cheerios4    cheerios10

The old one claims that Cheerios can help lower your cholesterol four percent in six weeks, while the new one says by 10% in just one month. It further goes on to claim on the front panel that eating three servings of Cheerios a day “may reduce the risk of heart disease.”  The products themselves are unchanged. So what’s going on here?

*MOUSE PRINT:

Old box: “A [1998] clinical study showed that eating two 1-1/2 cup servings daily of Cheerios cereal reduced bad cholesterol when eaten as part of diet low in saturated fat and cholesterol.”

New box: “A new [2009] study proves that Cheerios cereal plus a reduced calorie diet that is low in fat can help lower bad cholesterol about 10% in one month. … Eat two 1-1/2 cup servings [daily] … and cut 500 calories from your diet.”

So basically, Cheerios found a new study that lets them tout a significantly enhanced cholesterol reduction claim. Well, “found” is too strong a word. How about paid for and co-authored an as yet unpublished study? (See abstract of the study, which was published, in a somewhat unconventional journal.)

*MOUSE PRINT:

cheeriosabstract

This is not to say that every study paid for by a corporation is suspect, but it seems a bit unusual that the company also co-authored the study.

General Mills says that 204 overweight/obese adults with high LDL (bad) cholesterol were tested. While General Mills touts Cheerios helps lower  (bad) cholesterol 10% on its box and website, the abstract of the study seems to say it was actually lowered only 8.7%.

All of this has not made the FDA happy, so they sent the company a warning letter in May. The letter asserts that the  health claims the company is making for Cheerios puts it in the category of a drug, and they have not registered Cheerios as a drug. Interestingly, the letter only refers to the original 4% claim, and not the new 10% one.

Time will tell how this cereal drama plays out, but odds are all their cholesterol lowering claims won’t disappear completely and you still won’t need a prescription to buy Cheerios.

Updated every Monday!   Subscribe to free weekly newsletter.

Warning: Don’t Eat Your Dog!

vitamin1Recently, a Mouse Print* reader (Faith) who had purchased a bottle of 21st Century K-9 Maximum Joint Formula, wrote a note of concern about a warning she found on the back of the bottle.

This product is primarily a glucosamine and chondroitin pill to help make a dog’s joints more flexible.

In addition to warning that this product should not be given to dogs that are diabetic, pregnant, or allergic to shellfish (what misfortune it must be to own a dog that can’t eat lobster and shrimp), the label also says:

*MOUSE PRINT:

vitamin2

Faith was concerned by that startling warning that seeming suggested the product was okay for animals but not for humans.

When asked to explain this odd warning, the company said:

Pet Nutrition labels are regulated by AAFCO and require certain wording.
In simpler terms, the warning means not to give the supplements to
animals such as cattle, hogs, chickens, etc., that will be butchered
(human consumption).  -- 21st Century Vitamins customer service

That doesn’t exactly explain what the possible harm could be, but as Faith joked in her email, “now that we have been giving our dog the formula, I guess we won’t be able to barbeque him this spring. Darn!”